Long-Term Sickness Does Not Mean an Employee Cannot Return

A key misconception in capability processes is that prolonged absence equates to incapability. This is not supported by case law.

In BS v Dundee City Council, the court confirmed that absence alone is not sufficient justification for dismissal. Employers must understand whether a return is possible and what support may enable it.

The focus should shift from absence to capability. Without this shift, organisations risk making premature and legally unsafe decisions. Capability must be assessed with evidence,not assumption.

Do you need any services?

07912 577723

hello@thrivergent.co.uk
naznin@thrivergent.co.uk

Our Latest Post

Burns v Gitpod (2025): When Misconduct May Be Disability-Related

Burns v Gitpod (2025): When…

The tribunal decision in Burns v Gitpod (2025) highlights a growing area…

Why Most Long-Term Sickness Dismissals Fail at Tribunal

Why Most Long-Term Sickness Dismissals…

Dismissals linked to long-term sickness often fail not because the absence was…

Reasonable Adjustments and Sickness Absence: Where Employers Go Wrong

Reasonable Adjustments and Sickness Absence:…

One of the most common tribunal risks arises from failure to consider…